Almost there . . .
×
Site language modal icon
EN
Find

📢 Every story has two sides. Don't skip the Nanny's Response.

Nightmare Confinement: Agency Deception, Nanny Negligence, and Unprofessionalism

10
🤱
Undermining Breastfeeding
👥
Replacement Nanny
🤥
Dishonesty
📱
Phone Use
👶
Neglecting Baby
💸
Extra Fees
Safety Negligence
🚫
Ignoring Instructions
💬
Unsolicited Advice
😡
Disrespectful
Agency, 2015
Singapore Singapore
Source: singaporemotherhood
Confinement Angel agency - Nannys from Hell
👶
🧼
👥
🧔
+3
Agency, 2025
Singapore Singapore
Source: singaporemotherhood
Extremely Disappointed with Confinement Nanny and Agency 🚫
🍼
🤥
👥
🧼
+3
Agency, 2025
Singapore Singapore
Source: facebook
Disastrous Confinement Experiences with PEM and Confinement Angels Nannies Leave Client Exhausted
🚮
🤥
👦
🤥
+11
Agency, 2024
Singapore Singapore
Source: facebook
妈妈吐槽PEM金牌月嫂:危险操作、卫生差、态度恶劣且不负责任
🤫
💰
💥
🤥
+6
Agency, 2024
Singapore Singapore
Source: facebook
Client Alleges Confinement Agency's Negligence After Horrific Experiences with Two Confinement Nannies
🚫
📱
🤥
🧼
+6
Agency, 2023
Singapore Singapore
Source: facebook
Mummy Reports Senior Confinement Nanny's Unhygienic Practices and Negligent Baby Care
🧼
🤥
👶
🤦
+3
Agency, 2023
Singapore Singapore
Source: facebook
PEM Agency's Nanny Chaos, Poor Service, and Payment Disputes Stress New Mom
👥
🚫
🤥
👶
+6
Agency, 2022
Singapore Singapore
Source: facebook
PEM Nanny's Bossy Attitude, Neglect, and Unsafe Baby Care
🧼
📱
🚫
+3
Agency, 2022
Singapore Singapore
Source: facebook
Confinement Nanny Mistreats Baby, Exhibits Negligence, Fired After Four Days
💤
🚫
👶
+1
Agency, 2022
Singapore Singapore
Source: hardwarezone
Confinement Nanny's Abusive Behavior, Neglect, and Disrespect Enrage Mother
👶
👦
💰
😢
+7
Agency, 2022
Singapore Singapore
Source: facebook
Disclaimer

Summary of the Complaint

A parent recounts a distressing experience with I-kare confinement agency and its manager, May, involving two problematic nannies. The complaint details how the agency provided a different nanny than promised and then a replacement who exhibited severe negligence, dishonesty, and unprofessional behavior, including harming the baby and refusing to honor agreed-upon service extensions.

Mummy's Key Complaints

bullet

First Nanny's Issues:

bullet

Not the nannies promised by the agency's manager, May.

bullet

Moved the newborn from the cot to sleep with her on her mattress.

bullet

Constantly watched TV, even while feeding the baby, and blamed the baby for slow feeding.

bullet

Lied about having experience in Singapore.

bullet

Was disorganized, not preparing items before bathing the baby.

bullet

Exhibited unhygienic practices: drinking directly from the baby's milk bottle to test temperature and touching teats after sterilization.

bullet

Neglected the baby, requiring constant reminders for feeding and diaper changes.

bullet

Scratched the baby's umbilical cord wound, causing bleeding, without realizing it.

bullet

Second Nanny's Issues:

bullet

Talked on the phone for several hours daily, sometimes while working.

bullet

Did not cook breakfast unless specifically asked, offering only Milo.

bullet

Joked about the mummy's low breast milk supply.

bullet

Made unnecessary comments about the mummy's mother's habits or cooking.

bullet

Carried the baby to the living room to watch TV at night when the baby should have been in the bedroom.

bullet

Agency (May) Issues:

bullet

Sent a different nanny than those shown and lied about her experience.

bullet

Initially promised a replacement for the first nanny, but then asked for a "second chance" for the same nanny.

bullet

Promised additional service days as compensation but reduced the agreed-upon extension.

bullet

Calculated refunds incorrectly and became hostile ("complain to CASE") when questioned.

bullet

Lied to the second nanny about the mummy's agreement to early departure.

bullet

Badmouthed the mummy to the second nanny, calling her calculative and claiming complaints were fake.

Under-qualification
Unprofessionalism

Full Complaint Details

I would like to share my horrible experience with I-kare here so that you will think twice if you engage their service.

The person in charge for i-kare is May. My friend recommended her to me when I was finding a confinement lady. I did not do much research about i-kare and just engaged her service.

When signing the contract, Mat indicated that she will either assign auntie A or auntie B to me in the contract. She also showed me their good customer feedback. Therefore, I was quite happy with the arrangements.

On the first day, saw the confinement lady who brought to me by May, I immediately knew that she is not the 2 confinement nannies who May showed me previously. I asked May but she just told me this confinement nanny is also not bad. She also told me that this confinement nanny has few years experience and can cook well. I trusted her so just accepted the arrangement. This is the beginning of the nightmare.

On the first night, this confinement nanny shifted my baby from the baby cot to sleep with her on the mattress that we provided to her. When I asked her for the reason, she told me because the baby may be scared of sleeping alone. (!!!) I told her not to do that again. But this was not the most shocking thing that she did.

The following 8 days, she did more unacceptable things:-

1. Kept watching TV. She switched on the TV whole day even when she was in the kitchen. She just stared at the TV when feeding my baby and still blamed my baby for drinking milk so slow when I asked her why took so long to let my baby finish the milk.

2. She told me that she only has one year confinement experience in her hometown in M'sia, NO experience in S'pore. It means May lied to me about her experience!!

3. She was very disorganised in taking care of baby. For e.g. she did not prepare the necessary items before bathing the baby so she was rushing around the room to get clothes, baby lotion, diaper and etc after she bathed the baby.

4. Unhygiene - She tested the water temperature by drinking the water directly from the milk bottle. (Her lips touched the milk bottle!!!). Also, she used her hand to hold the milk bottle teat after sterilized it! I complained to May and she told me that she already scolded her.

5. She always neglected the baby. For e.g. she did not feed my baby on time, and always needed my reminder about feeding and diaper changing.

6. The most unacceptable matter was she scratched my baby's umbilical cord wound and caused it bleeding. The worst is she did not realise it until I saw it.

During her service of nine days, I complained to May once, she promised to give me a replacement initially but later on she msg me and said she already scolded the confinement nanny and asked me to give her one more chance. But I could not tolerate anymore when she hurt my baby so I asked May to take her away even without replacement.

On the 9th day, May brought another confinement nanny to replace this first confinement nanny. She promised to ask this replacement nanny to work additional one week to compensate me.

This second confinement nanny is more experienced in taking care of baby. However, she is another nightmare.

1. She talked on phone few hours daily. Sometimes even talking on the phone while doing her work.

2. She did not cook breakfast for me and only made a cup of Milo if I did not specially ask her to prepare breakfast.

3. She joked about my breast milk supply is low several times until I asked her to stop it.

4. She made unnecessary comments on my mum's habit or cookings thought it would not impact her.

5. She carried my baby to the living room so that she could watch TV at night even when my baby was tired and she supposed to bring him to the bedroom.

However, I did not take initiative to complain about this second nanny to May as I was very tired and wanted to get all these over asap.

Until one day, May sms and asked me to provide her some photos of my baby with the confinement nanny. I refused to do that as I did not want to let her use my photos as compliment and mislead other ppl. May asked me why, I just briefly said I am not satisfied with the service provided by this second nanny.

Initially May promised that she will let this second confinement nanny to work additional one week in order to compensate the bad service from the first confinement lady. However, when I sms May to reconfirm the last day of this second nanny, the date that she gave me is just compensate 4 days. But I did not persue further as I just wanted to get it over soon.

One week before the service ends, the confinement nanny informed me that she would leave 4 days earlier (which is the initially service end date). She said May told her that she has already communicated to me and I agreed to let her leave early. I sms May to ask her about this, she replied that the nanny misunderstood her meaning, she said she was about to discuss with me. She said she could feel that I was not happy with the service provided so OUT OF GOODWILL, she will refund me the 4 days charges. When I asked her to clarify why she was not based on the full charged amount for the calculation, she replied me this is in the contract, I can go to complain to CASE if I am not satisfied. I was very shocked with her reply, all this while I have been trusting her so much and I was just asking her to clarify but she gave me such attitude.

But this is not the end of the story yet, one or two days before the last day, the confinement nanny told me that she will leave in the morning instead of the regular timing of afternoon. She told me that May told her that she ALREADY talked to me and I agreed to that. But ever since the previous sms, May did not contact me anymore!!!

Previously, May promised that the nanny wil work addtional 2 or 3 hours on her last day as both the first and second nanny reached my house late on their first day. I was very unhappy that May lied again so I sms her that I insisted to only release the nanny at 3pm. May did not reply my sms but I overheard her phone conversation with the nanny, she lied to the nanny that I wanted to make things difficult to her (the confinement nanny), I am very calculative, my complaints are fake one and etc.

Eventually, I still released the nanny earlier in the morning as she had urgent matter need to go back to KL and I have no intention to make thing difficult for her.

Iinitially I did not want to share my story here, firstly I do not want to make my friend feels bad about recommending May's service to me. Secondly, I have been very busy taking care of my baby alone. Thirdly, I am really lazy to tell my long story.

But now I decided to share it here because I hope this can remind who are considering i-kare service to think twice before making the decision.

Thank you for reading this long story. Hope it helps when you need to make that critical decision. It's always good to do more research before engage confinement service.

No response received yet
Are you the Nanny involved in this case?
Your personal information will not be shared
Be the first to comment
Do you have a Complaint?
Submit your complaint for public viewing.