Almost there . . .
×
Site language modal icon
EN

📢 Every story has two sides. Don't skip the Nanny's Response.

Confinement Nanny Accused of Scamming Multiple Expectant Mothers with Concurrent Bookings

6
🤥
Dishonesty
💸
Extra Fees
🤥
Misrepresentation
🚧
Unexplained Absence
No-Show
🤔
Deceptive Practices
Freelance, 2020
Singapore Singapore
Source: straitstimes
月嫂收押金与药材费后失联,疑涉诈骗行为
🤥
🤫
💸
🚧
Freelance, 2022
Singapore Singapore
Source: facebook
月嫂收押金借钱后失联,疑涉诈骗行为
😢
🤫
🚧
💸
+1
Freelance, 2022
Singapore Singapore
Source: facebook
Confinement Nanny WONG WAI LING (Hui Ling) & Referrer CONNIE: Unreliable, Dishonest, and Refused Refund
🤔
🤥
💸
+3
Freelance, 2022
Singapore Singapore
Source: singaporemotherhood
Confinement Nanny Nightmares: Real Mums Share Their Worst Experiences
🤱
🤦
🥣
📱
+14
Freelance, 2021
Singapore Singapore
Source: facebook
Mummies Warn of Nanny Scam Involving Fake Deposits and False Promises
💸
🤷
🤥
🚧
+1
Freelance, 2021
Singapore Singapore
Source: facebook
Mummy Warns About Confinement Nanny Deposit Scams
🤥
💸
Freelance, 2020
Singapore Singapore
Source: facebook
Confinement Nanny Scams Expectant Mother, Demands Unreasonable Terms
🤥
💰
💸
🚧
+1
Freelance, 2017
Singapore Singapore
Source: singaporemotherhood
Confinement Nanny's Bad Attitude, Poor Hygiene, and Baby Neglect Exposed
😡
🤷
👶
🫘
+8
Freelance, 2012
Singapore Singapore
Source: singaporemotherhood
Title Confinement Nanny Irene Yong Nyuk Yin Accused of Deposit Scam and Threats
🚧
🤫
🤥
💸
+1
Freelance, 2011
Singapore Singapore
Source: malaysianmotherhood
Nanny's Last-Minute Abandonment Causes Pre-Birth Stress
🤥
🚧
😢
Freelance, 2011
Singapore Singapore
Source: mummysg
Disclaimer

Summary of the Complaint

Three expectant mothers have filed police reports against a confinement nanny who allegedly accepted deposits for four overlapping assignments in November. Clients, including Ms. Zheng, Ms. Chen Kaihui, and Mr. Zhong's wife, paid deposits totaling hundreds of dollars, and some also paid for ingredients. The nanny later claimed illness or denied wrongdoing, failing to return most of the deposits. Investigations are ongoing, with suspicions the nanny lacks professional experience.

Mummy's Key Complaints

bullet

Accepted deposits from at least four expectant mothers for concurrent November confinement jobs.

bullet

Shared misleading photos of past assignments and cooked dishes to appear experienced.

bullet

Took a $600 deposit from Ms. Zheng, plus an additional $118 for ingredients.

bullet

Accepted a $960 deposit from Mr. Zhong's wife.

bullet

Received a $660 deposit from Ms. Chen Kaihui.

bullet

Failed to show up for assignments, citing poor health or claiming to be "framed."

bullet

Failed to return most deposit amounts; Ms. Zheng and Ms. Chen received only $50, Mr. Zhong's wife received nothing.

bullet

Allegedly owed $500 to another confinement lady who covered five days for her.

bullet

Denied all accusations when contacted by media, claiming misunderstanding and being framed.

bullet

Suspected of lacking professional confinement experience and being a zichar stall assistant.

Scam

Full Complaint Details

A confinement nanny was found to have taken up four assignments in November, prompting three of the expectant mothers to file police reports against her.

Among them is 27-year-old Ms Zheng, whose baby is due soon.

When interviewed by Lianhe Wanbao, Ms Zheng said that she had found the confinement nanny through a Facebook group and the two began communicating.

The nanny shared photos of her with babies from previous assignments as well as multiple pictures of confinement dishes that she had apparently cooked.

Ms Zheng added: "She looked very experienced and her confinement meals looked appetising to me, so I agreed to engage her for my confinement in November."

The confinement nanny quoted a price of $3,200 and requested for a $600 deposit, which Ms Zheng readily agreed to.

A few days later, the nanny asked if Ms Zheng wanted to purchase ingredients for confinement meals and the pregnant mother paid another $118 for them.

Having settled on a confinement lady, Ms Zheng thought she could enjoy peace of mind, but did not expect to see a Facebook post in October about the same nanny.

The post was by another confinement lady surnamed Hu, who said that she had covered five days of confinement for the nanny but was still owed $500 for the work.

There were also another three mothers, all of whom were due in November, who had paid a deposit to the same nanny.

The husband of one of the pregnant women, Mr Zhong, said the confinement nanny had accepted a deposit in $960 in August.

However, in October, the nanny suddenly claimed to be in poor health and said she would find someone to replace her.

Ms Chen Kaihui, a 33-year-old housewife, said she had paid a $660 deposit.

She added: "The nanny agreed to everything. How can she go to four places at the same time in a month to do confinement?"

When Ms Chen asked the nanny for her deposit back, the other party said she had no money.

Ms Chen shared: "She claimed that she was being framed by other confinement nannies and said she had spent the deposit. To date, she has only returned $50."

Ms Zheng also said that she has only gotten $50 back, while Mr Zhong said he has not received a penny.

As all the pregnant women had liaised directly with the nanny, they were not expecting anyone else to do their confinement.

Sensing something amiss and questioning the nanny's intentions, three of the women — including Ms Zheng — lodged a police report.

The police confirmed that reports were lodged and investigations are ongoing.

It is said that the nanny is merely an assistant at a zichar stall and has no professional confinement experience.

When contacted by Wanbao, the nanny denied the accusations and said she had been misunderstood, but did not explain further.

However, she said that was being framed and had reported the matter to the police.

Get more of Stomp's latest updates by following us on Facebook, WhatsApp, Twitter, Instagram and YouTube.

No response received yet
Are you the Nanny involved in this case?
Your personal information will not be shared
Be the first to comment
Do you have a Complaint?
Submit your complaint for public viewing.